A revitalized biopsychosocial model: core theory, research paradigms, and clinical implications PMC

Finally, the LOS findings were of interest in the context of the development of ever shorter brief interventions for alcohol and drug treatment. Much work is still needed to understand the optimal treatment length for a particular individual https://cok24.ru/ro/kak-bystro-protrezvet-v-domashnih-usloviyah-kak-otrezvet-za-chas-v.html by adopting personalised medicine approaches for outcome studies. However, this study suggests that for treatment-seeking individuals with complex presentations, the widespread three-month treatment benchmark [9] may be inadequate.

  • You can further explore poverty, race, gender, and other examples of intersectionality that may play a role in a person’s substance use/addiction as you are working with them, ensuring your work is cultural, spiritual, gender-sensitive and trauma-informed.
  • Theory is necessary as well as data, of the sort outlined in the first part of the paper.
  • All sociodemographic and biopsychosocial characteristics, as well as other substance dependence or abuse were tested independently in unadjusted models to examine the relationship of each characteristic on opioid misuse.

Clinical implications

Second, although the data are nationally representative, the survey is cross-sectional, and it excludes some subsets of the population. The NSDUH only targets noninstitutionalized US citizens, so active-duty military members and institutionalized groups (e.g., prisoners, hospital patients, treatment center patients, and nursing home members) are excluded. Thus, if substance use differs between US noninstitutionalized and institutionalized groups by more than 3%, data may be problematic for the total US population [44].

Substance Use Disorders

  • Although the BPSM itself is not a necessary or sufficient tool for uncovering these relationships, it can certainly focus attention on them in several useful ways.
  • Consequently, these data represent a sample who have had a ‘minimum dose’ of at least 3-weeks in the TC.
  • When it comes to understanding behavior, including addiction, there are multiple approaches that can be taken.

Due to these findings, we suggest that one inpatient treatment stay is often inadequate for reaching personal wellbeing and a higher quality of life. Being in recovery includes a long-time search for a better life and increased quality of life with the collaborative support of others, including professionals, when needed [6, 15, 21, 27, 28]. It has been criticized that treatment and the ongoing recovery process focuses on substance use only http://www.snowflakebase.com/Breckenridge/page/4/ [6]. Substance use was influential in informants’ narratives but closely connected to other areas of life, such as mental health, close relationships, safe housing and meaningful daytime occupations. Also, the biological and psychological impacts of using substances, as well as individual reflections on either quitting all substances or maintaining the use of alcohol or marihuana, were essential parts of the informants’ meaning-making.

a biopsychosocial approach to substance abuse

Biopsychosocial Model & Substance Abuse Treatment

  • There is the further important point that the increasing voice of the person as patient has been substantially a consequence of activism and wider socio-political movements, not a matter of healthcare theory and research (Brown, 1981; Rashed, 2019).
  • This can extend to legal substances such as alcohol or tobacco (including, in recent years, the increased prohibition against cigarette smoking in public spaces and its growing social unacceptability in private spaces).
  • The brain responds to particular social cues that may provide instant pleasure, or regulate biological homeostasis, such as relief from withdrawal (Li and Sinha 2008).
  • Safe housing, close relationships, and activities were essential for the informants to reach their goals of controlling or quitting substance use.

According to the model, illness is a product of dynamic interactions among the sorts of factors listed in Fig. BPSM researchers have also explored how social status and stressors can affect health outcomes (Bolton and Gillett 2019; Engel 1977). Just as people who are http://chudinov.ru/etruskologiya/ actively using or abusing substances bond over that common experience to create a drug culture that supports their continued substance use, people in recovery can participate in activities with others who are having similar experiences to build a culture of recovery.

a biopsychosocial approach to substance abuse

Health factors

a biopsychosocial approach to substance abuse

In brief, psychological causation, implemented in brain processes, involves regulation of behavioral functioning toward attaining or maintaining some state. Social factors can causally interact with psychological processes, for example by regulating task demands and available resources. Psychological and social causal processes are both causal in the sense of regulatory, as is one kind of causation in biology, the other being energy transformations and exchanges covered by physicochemical laws.

Essential is the person’s perceptions and descriptions of their current situation regarding wellbeing, belonging to a community, and a positive sense of identity, including perceptions of a better life while living with core symptoms [44]. The person’s perceptions of the recovery process and their wellbeing constantly interplay with the relational, social, cultural and political surroundings as understood within a biopsychosocial approach [7, 9, 31, 41, 43]. This article provides an overview of the tools for psychosocial assessment of substance use disorders. Various psychosocial factors need to be assessed for effective management of individuals and to carry out research in the field.

a biopsychosocial approach to substance abuse

Foundations of Addiction Studies

  • The revitalized, cross-disciplinary BPSM proposed here can be used to theorize personal and institutional factors relevant to clinical care and highlight their role as critical and not merely discretionary considerations.
  • Second, although the data are nationally representative, the survey is cross-sectional, and it excludes some subsets of the population.
  • In several descriptions of the OPPERA project offered by field leaders, we find additional question-begging transformations of TMD.
  • Sometimes it is by choice, or experience, a negative representation of what they believed culture meant.
  • The model contextualizes the responsibility placed on the individual and further allows for individual members of society to reflect on their own contributions in facilitating substance misuse (Levy 2007b).
Scroll to Top